Outdoor Photographer Magazine 1985-2023
16 Comments
Summary: My relationship with Outdoor Photography Magazine first as a reader, then a contributor, spanned the entirety of my career in nature photography. As it publishes its final issue which features a 32-page article with my words and photographs, I reflect on the history of the magazine and what happened.
It is rare for a military school to be one of the most elite institutions of higher learning in its country, but such is the case of France’s Ecole Polytechnique. As a student with modest means, I appreciated the status of paid officer cadet very much. Using my newly-received salary, the first major purchase I made was the first autofocus SLR camera, which had just been released. I was far from being aware of it back then – my copy is from eBay, but this time nearly coincided with the release of the premier issue of Outdoor Photographer Magazine in June 1985.
Although not a cover photograph, the main feature of that issue was a nine-page interview with Galen Rowell by Steve Werner. Werner, the magazine’s founder, viewed Rowell as an archetype of his target reader, “a fairly even blend of outdoorsman and photographic artist”. Even though, with his exceptional abilities, Rowell couldn’t really be representative of the average reader, he could be the person they aspired to be. A few years later, my engagement with the mountains and with photography had deepened. Few in France had heard of Rowell. However, a new colleague had freshly arrived from North America to take a position in the lab near Cannes in the French Riviera where I was doing my graduate research. When he showed me Mountain Light, I instantly realized that photographs of mountains could be elevated to an art form. I, too aspired to be Rowell as he became my first role model and shadow mentor in photography and in adventure.
In February of 1993, the now-closed bookstore Black Oak Books on Shattuck Avenue in Berkeley, California held an author event for Galen Rowell, on the occasion of the release of Galen Rowell’s Vision. I had just taken residence in an apartment a few blocks away and learned by chance of the event, from which the signature on my copy dates. The new book consisted of a collection of columns that Galen had previously written for Outdoor Photographer. Barbara Rowell had lamented that magazine publishers tended to take advantage of Galen’s reputation in their first issues before dropping the relationship, but Steve Warner did not make that mistake. Instead, the magazine largely gave free rein to Galen for his column “Photo Adventure”. It was a win for both, as Galen envisioned it from the start as building blocks for a book, while he turned out to be one of the most popular contributors to the magazine. Outdoor Photographer thrived on much of the innovations that were instrumental to Galen’s success: the refinement of the 35mm SLR camera, the emergence of modern outdoor gear, the growth of ecotourism and adventure travel.
Galen was the contributor that got me reading Outdoor Photographer, but he wasn’t the only columnist of distinction. Outstanding regular essayists included luminaries such as Dewitt Jones, Frans Lanting, William Neill and many others from all the disciplines of nature, travel, and adventure photography. Any favorite writers? Bill was particularly influential to me in the late 1990s because his meditative approach provided a counterpoint to Galen’s hyper-active operating mode, and also because he used the tool I was gravitating towards, the large format camera. Recently, he even repeated Galen’s publication model by releasing his inspiring book Light on the Landscape, based on more than 140 columns he wrote in Outdoor Photographer since 1997. The magazine’s editors gave those photographers a forum to write whatever they wanted from the heart, and in turn their excellence made the magazine consistently worth reading. More generally, Outdoor Photographer became the premier photo publication with a focus on the natural world because its contributors were among the most celebrated names in the field.
I therefore felt extremely honored when the magazine published a profile about my work in 2013 and in subsequent years invited me to contribute several major features, often for their summer issue focussed on national parks. The last one, in the June/July 2023 issue, entitled “Top 10 Less-Crowded National Parks” (not my own choice of title), extends for thirty-two pages, representing exactly one-third of the issue’s total number of pages – the longest article I’ve seen in the history of the magazine. Read most of it here. More than half of the images was photographed on 5×7 film. Although summer is my least-favorite season to travel to the parks, the color palette of the images is dominated by greens because it is a summer issue for which I knew not to submit images obviously from other seasons. I am pleased for find myself in the company of the other contributors: William Neill, Amy Gulick, Josh Miller (Yosemite is popular!), Glenn Randall, Eric Bennett, Dave Welling (cover image), and Jason Bradley. This publication is special because, sadly, it is the final issue of Outdoor Photographer. If you have a copy, keep it because it may become a collectible one day! Correct me if I am wrong, but I think Outdoor Photographer was the last (almost) monthly photography magazine in the U.S.
Why is Outdoor Photographer ceasing publication? Much of traditional media has been in decline for years because of the Internet. Companies have decided that electronic advertising options are more promising. There are fewer people willing to pay for high-quality content when there is so much out there for free, even if the quality is a mixed bag. Younger photography enthusiasts who live on the phone do not care for print media. The high point of Outdoor Photographer‘s arc was probably in the 2000s, but by the end of that decade, social media, launched in the mid-2000s and combined with digital photography had decisively changed the Internet and photographic practice. Looking at the issues of the past few years, it was clear that the contents has thinned and the printing quality declined compared to the heydays.
Several excellent digital photography publications more specialized than Outdoor Photographer prosper because they don’t have to depend on the costly logistical challenges of printing and distributing the issues, which alleviates the need for advertising revenue. However, they are not the same as a printed magazine much the same way as a web gallery is a poor substitute for a photography book. Moreover, those younger publications have not yet reached the iconic status of well-established magazines. Back in the 2000s, there were other magazines in the same niche, but Outdoor Photographer was the best of them. As I prepare to move into a new phase, Outdoor Photographer‘s 38-year run spanned the entirety of my career in nature photography.
It is always sad to see the end of an era, but change is inevitable. Accelerating the trend, conglomerates identify distressed media assets, scoop them up to extracting whatever value is left, and kill the rest. Recent years have seen the demise of many influential U.S. publications (U.K.’s seem more resilient), although some survive as websites. They include Popular Photography which lasted 80 years and had at its peak a circulation of a million, Photo District News, the magazine of reference of professional photographers, American Photo, Rangefinder, and Shutterbug. Correct me if I am wrong, but think that <Outdoor Photographer was the last monthly printed photography magazine in the U.S. The magazine had already gone bankrupt in 2015 when it was subsequently sold by Werner Publishing to Madavor Media.
Outdoor Photographer ran again into serious cash flow issues in the second half of 2022 and incurred significant debt, after Madavor was hit with paper shortages and the printer demanded double the contracted price. Again, an acquisition occurred, by the BeBop Channel Corporation in February 2023. Curiously, the new parent company’s revenue is only a small fraction of Madavor Media. With their focus residing on performing arts such as Jazz, dance, and theatre, they appear to have been interested mostly in Madavor Media’s iconic JazzTimes. This erratic move was quickly followed by others. Per their latest media kit, Outdoor Photographer reaches an audience of two million, including 168,000 magazine readers. Many publications are sustained by an order of magnitude fewer readers. Insiders say that Outdoor Photographer by itself was profitable, but dragged down by other Madavor publications. Yet in May, not even attempting to keep the website updated, BeBop laid off all the staff of Madavor Media’s photography publications. This was while they were negotiating the sale of the magazine. They then put up for sale as a $500,000 package not only the now-hollowed Outdoor Photographer, but also Digital Photo Pro, Digital Photo, Image Creators Network, and Imaging Resource. For a moment, it would seem that Giggster Inc, a company in the photography space, would buy all those properties, however, the sale fell through, and in June BeBop filled a lawsuit against Giggster Inc. for breach of contract and fraud.
Contributors were treated no better than staff and subscribers. Despite Bebop’s promises to take care of Madavor’s debt, more than a hundred freelancers remain unpaid. Not only BeBop’s CEO tries to shift the responsibility to the former owners Zilpin Group Inc, encouraging us to sue Zilpin instead of BeBop, he blamed us freelancers for continuing to contribute. Indeed, I was still waiting for an article I delivered in June 2022 to be paid. Yet, when Outdoor Photographer‘s new editor Dan Havlik invited me to contribute to the Summer 2023 issue, I did not hesitate to accept. For many of my magazine articles, I used the riskier publication model of serialization which is kind of the opposite of what Galen Rowell and William Neill did. I first published a book (Treasured Lands) and then extracted material from it for magazine articles. There are always changes and contextualizing to be done, but that’s much less time-consuming than writing an article from scratch. Working with the magazine for a decade with three different editors, I felt a sense of loyalty toward the publication. Having learned much from past issues, I liked an opportunity to pay it forward. Because of how respected the magazine was, I still saw providing articles as an honor.
My thirty-year relationship with Outdoor Photographer Magazine as a reader and then a contributor ends on a simultaneous low and high note. Although I have never worked for free and I am owed thousands of dollars, writing for the magazine was not mainly about money. A main feature in the final issue of the magazine whose premier issue opened with Galen Rowell? Priceless.
Well said, Tuan! In a business that has seen a lot of change over the years, you have always been dignified in your writing and set a high bar with your photography. OP owes you more than just payment. Having your work in its final edition is as much a credit to them as it is to you.
Guy
Thanks for stopping by, Guy. I am humbled by your comment since your writing is so much more dignified than mine, and you set such a higher bar. I agree that the relationship between a magazine and its authors (notable or not) goes both ways. Of course, publishing a notable author/photographer enhances the magazine’s reputation as a discerning platform for quality content. But even featuring the work someone less notable showcases new talent and appeals to readers who appreciate an inclusive, risk-taking and forward-thinking publication.
The new owner is a clown but still an honor to get such a feature in the final issue of OP. For me it came a little bit later but seeing Galen’s work in OP is what got me curious about landscape photography. My cousin brought a copy on a roadtrip and it was Galen’s photo on the cover that caught my eye.
Thanks Richard. Each of the three owners at some point failed to pay contributors, but it is the last one who killed the magazine within a few months of acquisition. Maybe it is because I came to photography from an outdoors background, for many of my friends, Galen was OP’s main draw.
History does repeat itself… Madavor refused to pay me for my last three columns I wrote for the Werner regime. So they are not really any more upright than the sharks that ate them.
Thanks for stopping by, Bob. I always appreciated your column in OP for the practical insights on travel photography coming from one of its most accomplished practitioners.
Tuan, I’m very sorry to learn both of the demise of OP and of the shabby treatment of freelancers by Bebop and previous owners. One more excellent print publication bites the dust. There are so few left. I had such high hopes for the Internet in early days but its added value has come at a tremendously high cost which has yet to be fully paid. I’ll look forward to seeing more of your work in other venues.
Thanks for commenting Steve. Overall, the impact of the Internet has been positive, but some of the things it displaced are missed.
As with many I’m sure, I share your sentiment about OP and the quality of print and writing that endured over the years. It is a sad ending and I’m sorry to hear you were among those who were not compensated. I was fortunate to have a couple of covers and an nice portfolio back when Werner was at the helm. And like you, I was first drawn to the publication by Galen’s column and I’m grateful to have had a small connection with that legacy.
Thanks for stopping by, Russ. I think I’ve seen some of those, certainly cover-worthy!
It’s a shame what happened to OP but it is a sign of the times, unfortunately. I’ve been a reader and subscriber since nearly the very first issue, and it was always a thrill when a new issue showed up in the mailbox. I’ve been fortunate to have photos published in countless magazines over the years, but one dream was to see my work grace the OP pages. While submitting a couple of articles that got rejected, I guess that is a dream that will remain unfulfilled.
I do hope that you and all those authors get paid for your work one day soon. It seems the day of real print publications has reached it’s conclusion.
Sorry to hear that this one got away, especially from such a loyal reader. Sometimes the universe is playing a joke on you.
Qt, you have always been a class act and earned my deepest respect as an artist and business man. I look forward to seeing your next phase! Be well.
Thanks Kirk! For art, the jury is still out, but I’ve concluded that business is not my forte…
QT, what happened to Outdoor Photographer makes me think of General Dwight MacArthur’s quote from an old song — “Old soldiers never die; they just fade away.” That’s what seemed to have happened toward the end of Werner Publishing, when so many of us were left unpaid in spite of the best efforts of Chris Robinson to get it done, & as the magazine tried to move forward without the brilliance of its origin. I’m wondering if any magazine catering to a very particular audience can ever survive being transferred out of its birthright. That said, having YOUR work in the final issue pays appropriate tribute to what Outdoor Photographer once was, and to your own art as a vital part of what that was.
Thanks for the kind words, Ruth! It’s certainly been a long decline since the heydays. Chris Robinson told me he left because the downward trend weighted on him and didn’t appear reversible. Please pass my regards to David, whose contributions definitively represented the best of OP.